Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 15 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
15 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1942WP(C).No.11663 OF 2020(G) PETITIONER/S: CHEERAN JOSE SHUNSONPROPRIETOR, M/S.FOUR STAR ASSOCIATES, PERUMATTY GRAMAPANCHAYATH, PETTAMUKKU, KANNIMARI, PALAKKAD-676305. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2(5), AAYKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-686001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THRISSUR-686021.THRISSUR-686021. 3THE STATE BANK OF INDIA,MANAGER. ARTHAT BRANCH, THRISSUR-680521, REPRESENTED BY ITS OTHER PRESENT: SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON15.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 15[th] day of June 2020 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking adirection to dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the2[nd] respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Withoutexpressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, I disposeof the writ petition with a direction to the respondent totake a decision on Ext.P2 appeal and stay application Ext.P3in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of 30 days from thedate of receipt of a copy of the order. Till such time,recovery proceedings pursuant to the demand notice shallbe kept in abeyance. It is made clear that the interim stay istill the disposal of the interim application and not beyond. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL sab JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 24.12.2019. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT - 2017-18 DATED 24.1.2020. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT - 2017 - 18 DATED 24.1.2020. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 16.3.2020.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan