By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
High Court
29 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
29 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 7TH BHADRA, 1941
WP(C).No.5551 OF 2019(T)
PETITIONER:
RAGHAVAN NAIR'GOKULAM', VIJAYALAKSHMI MANDIRAM, KANNAMKULAM TEMPLE ROAD, CHALAKUDY EAST, CHALAKUDY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 307.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE - 2 (1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 001.2DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS)SOUTHERN RAILWAY, SALEM - 636 005.
R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXR2 BY SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN, SC, RAILWAYS SMT MARIA ELIZABETH WILSON FOR SRI.S.ANANTHANKRISHNAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Smt. Krishna K., the learned counsel for thepetitioner, Sri. Jose Joseph, the learned counsel for thefirst respondent and Smt. Maria Elizabeth Wilson forSri. S. Ananthakrishnan, the learned Standing Counselfor the second respondent.
2.The petitioner prays for the following reliefs:-
"(i)To direct the 1st respondent to grant credit for thetax deducted at source while making payments tothe petitioner herein as evidenced by Exts.P1 andP1(o) by the issue writ of mandamus or such otherwrit or order or direction. tax deducted at source while making payments tothe petitioner herein as evidenced by Exts.P1 andP1(o) by the issue writ of mandamus or such otherwrit or order or direction.
(ii)To direct the 1st respondent to pass orders onexhibits P4 and P5 applications as expeditiously aspossible by the issue of a writ of mandamus orsuch other writ or order or direction. exhibits P4 and P5 applications as expeditiously aspossible by the issue of a writ of mandamus orsuch other writ or order or direction.
(iii)To grant the petitioner such other incidental reliefsincluding the costs of these proceedings." including the costs of these proceedings."
3.Adv. Sri. Jose Joseph, appearing for the first
respondent referring to written instructions dated18.07.2019 states that the first respondent has re-examined the issue, a decision taken for granting refundof Rs. 1,85,950/- and now steps are taken to transferthe amount to the credit of petitioner's bank account.
WP(C).No.5551 OF 2019(T) 3
According to him, the grievance is substantiallyredressed by the first respondent himself. Therefore, thecause does not survive.
4.Adv. Smt. Krishna K. requests the Court toplace the statement on record and dispose of the writpetition.
Adv. Smt. Krishna K. requests the Court to
The writ petition is disposed of by accepting the
statement made on behalf of the first respondent, Thepetitioner, if does not get the relief within eight weeksfrom today, the petitioner is given liberty to file anapplication for recalling the instant judgment.
sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
DCS
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01-06-2006.
EXHIBIT P1 AEXHIBIT P1 BEXHIBIT P1 CEXHIBIT P1 DEXHIBIT P1 E
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19-10-2006.COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15-12-2006
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08-12-2006.
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28-12-2006
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23-02-2007
EXHIBIT P1 FEXHIBIT P1 GEXHIBIT P1 HEXHIBIT P1 IEXHIBIT P1 JEXHIBIT P1 KEXHIBIT P1 LEXHIBIT P1 MEXHIBIT P1 NEXHIBIT P1 OEXHIBIT P1 GEXHIBIT P1 HEXHIBIT P1 IEXHIBIT P1 JEXHIBIT P1 KEXHIBIT P1 LEXHIBIT P1 MEXHIBIT P1 NEXHIBIT P1 O
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10-04-2007
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30-04-2007
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19-10-2006.COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15-12-2006
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08-12-2006.
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28-12-2006
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23-02-2007
EXHIBIT P1 FEXHIBIT P1 GEXHIBIT P1 HEXHIBIT P1 IEXHIBIT P1 JEXHIBIT P1 KEXHIBIT P1 LEXHIBIT P1 MEXHIBIT P1 NEXHIBIT P1 OEXHIBIT P1 GEXHIBIT P1 HEXHIBIT P1 IEXHIBIT P1 JEXHIBIT P1 KEXHIBIT P1 LEXHIBIT P1 MEXHIBIT P1 NEXHIBIT P1 O
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10-04-2007
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30-04-2007
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20-03-2007
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08-05-2006
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01-03-2007
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21-04-2006THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21-04-2006
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IN FORM 16A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 31-05-2007
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.