Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna

High Court 13 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
13 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1941 WP(C).No.21943 OF 2019(P) PETITIONER: P.P.UNNEENKUTTY, AGED 68 YEARS,S/O. P.P.MOHAMMED,PARAMBIL PEEDIKAKKAL HOUSE, THACHAMPARA P.O., PALAKKAD-678 593. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA RESPONDENTS: 1THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE, AYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR -680 001. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM-682 036. BY ADV.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON13.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: akv JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessmentorder issued by the first respondent under IncomeTax Act, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the secondrespondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stayapplication. In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to take adecision on Ext.P3 stay application within a periodof two months. Till then, recovery proceedingspursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shallbe deferred. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 28.12.2018. EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FIELD BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 29.1.2019. EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 10.7.2019. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// CA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan