By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
High Court
24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5054 OF 2020(F)
PETITIONER:
THE CHITTUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,NO.18, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD-678 101, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NATARAJAN C., AGED 57, S/O. CHAMY.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 5, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.WARD 5, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOE TAX (APPEALS)AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680 001.
3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALBY ITS REGISTRAR.BY ITS REGISTRAR.
AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682 030, REPRESENTED
JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24th day of February 2020
The petitioner, a co-operative society filed an appeal as against
the assessment order under the Income Tax Act before the 3rdrespondent. The assessing authority insisted payment of 20% of thedisputed tax to grant stay against recovery, pending appeal.
In the light of the various judgments of this Court, the appellateauthority-3rd respondent is directed to dispose the appeal within aperiod of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till then,the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Orderedaccordingly.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 28.12.2018.
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 10.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT 2016-17 DATED 5.2.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 5.2.2020.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:-
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.