By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
High Court
11 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
11 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 22ND MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.3705 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONER/S:
THE THATHAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.P 502,THATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD-678012, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY K.JYOTHI, AGED 42, W/O.DIVYA PRASAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 5, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680021.
OTHER PRESENT:
SC JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) againstthe assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be keptin abeyance.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 25.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT - 2017-18 DATED 06.1.2020.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 07.01.2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.