Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna

High Court 02 Jul 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
02 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL THURSDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2020 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1942WP(C).No.8885 OF 2020(I) PETITIONER/S: KOONAMMAVU THOMAS JOHNYAGED 49 YEARSKOONAMMAVU HOUSE, KANIMANGALAM P O, THRISSUR-680027. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERTHRISSUR-680001. WARD 2(2), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON02.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 2nd day of July 2020 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the respondent. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of thematter, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to therespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal and stayapplication Ext.P3 in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of 30days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Till suchtime, recovery proceedings pursuant to the demand noticeshall be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that the interimstay is till the disposal of the interim application and notbeyond. Dxy Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 30.12.2019 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 2017-18 DATED12.02.2020 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 06.03.2020. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 03.03.2020.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan