By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
High Court
17 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
17 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8228 OF 2020(C)
PETITIONER:
SUBRAMANIAN BABUPROPRIETOR, SARAVANA FUELS, CHITTUR ROAD, MANAPULLIKAVU, PALAKKAD-678 001.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA
RESPONDENT:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1, PALAKKAD-678 001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680 001.3THE INDIAN BANK,1ST FLOOR, MALABAR FORT, KANDATH COMPLEX, PALAKKAD-678 00, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17th day of March 2020
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions
to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to consider Ext.P3 staypetition preferred along with the appeal, Ext.P2 against the orderof the assessment Ext.P1.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the appeal and stay application have been filed on11th March 2020. However, post thereto received a garnisheenotice Ext.P4. In these circumstances, the petitioner hasapproached this Court.
3. The learned Government Pleader submits that the
Tribunal would not have any difficulty in taking up the interimapplication but the appeals are being taken up on seniority basis.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties andappraised the paper book. Without expressing any opinion on themerits of the matter, I dispose of the writ petition with a directionto the third respondent to consider Ext.P3 interim application
preferred along with the appeal in accordance with law, afteraffording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within aperiod of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.Till such time, the operation of garnishee notice, Ext.P4 isordered to be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that the interimstay is till the disposal of the interim application and notbeyond.
dlk/19.03.2020
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 5.12.2019
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 2017-18 DATED11.3.2020
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.3.2020
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3D RESPONDENT BANK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.