By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
High Court
23 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
23 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: The tax demanded is Rs.41,46,763/-.There shall be an interim stay of recovery till theappeal is disposed of, if the petitioner deposits10% of the tax demanded on or before 30.04.2020 anda further 10% on or before 30.05.2020.The writ petition is disposed of with theabove directions.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1942
WP(C).No.9193 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
R.UNNIKRISHNANAGED 35 YEARS42/432, KANNAKI NAGAR, VADAKKANTHARA, PALAKKAD-678012.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERINCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD 2, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-6780142THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680021
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, ITDR.THUSHARA JAMES, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed against therecovery proceeded against while the first appealis pending. The tax demanded is Rs.41,46,763/-.There shall be an interim stay of recovery till theappeal is disposed of, if the petitioner deposits10% of the tax demanded on or before 30.04.2020 anda further 10% on or before 30.05.2020.The writ petition is disposed of with theabove directions.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.
sp/23/03/2020
//True Copy//
P.A. To Judge
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P2EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT-2017-18.
COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION WITH A MEDICALCERTIFICATE FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.