Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna

High Court 23 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna
Date of order
23 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menonsmt.k.krishna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: The tax demanded is Rs.41,46,763/-.There shall be an interim stay of recovery till theappeal is disposed of, if the petitioner deposits10% of the tax demanded on or before 30.04.2020 anda further 10% on or before 30.05.2020.The writ petition is disposed of with theabove directions.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1942 WP(C).No.9193 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: R.UNNIKRISHNANAGED 35 YEARS42/432, KANNAKI NAGAR, VADAKKANTHARA, PALAKKAD-678012. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENONSMT.K.KRISHNA RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERINCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD 2, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-6780142THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680021 SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, ITDR.THUSHARA JAMES, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The above writ petition is filed against therecovery proceeded against while the first appealis pending. The tax demanded is Rs.41,46,763/-.There shall be an interim stay of recovery till theappeal is disposed of, if the petitioner deposits10% of the tax demanded on or before 30.04.2020 anda further 10% on or before 30.05.2020.The writ petition is disposed of with theabove directions. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE. sp/23/03/2020 //True Copy// P.A. To Judge APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18. EXHIBIT P2EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT-2017-18. COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION WITH A MEDICALCERTIFICATE FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan