By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 | BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.41/7 OF 201 BETWEEN: 1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.INTERNATIONAL TAXATION# FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION# FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95.. 2.|THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX|INTERNATIONAL TAXATION|CIRCLE-1(1), PRESENT ADDRESSJCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATIONCIRCLE-2(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION|CIRCLE-1(1), PRESENT ADDRESSJCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATIONCIRCLE-2(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95.. .. APPELLANTS (BY SRI: JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR|SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED (VMSL) (FORMERLY M/S. VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED|AMALGAMATED WITH VMSL)- MARUTHI INFOTECH CENTRE|11/1, 12/1, KORAMANGALAAMAR JYOTI LAYOUTBENGALURU-560 0/71PAN: AABCB 584 ZL. RESPONDENT| (BY MS. JOMOL JOY, ADVOCATE FORSRI: ADITYA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE). THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER|DATED 02.01.2018 PASSED IN SP NO.296/BANG/2017 (IN|IT(TPJA NO.1161/BANG/2015), FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR)2014-2015, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO FORMULATE|THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE;|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN)S.P.NO.296/BANG/2017 (IN IT(TP)A NO.1161/BANG/2015),|DATED 02.01.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015, VIDEANNEXURE-F AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE|COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE|JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL|TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU. OK OK THISINCOMETAXAPPEALCOMING ON|FOR |ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT A memo is filed Dy the appellants’ Counsel seeking to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to challenge theimpugned order by filing the writ petition. — In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed.as withdrawn. Tne liberty as sought for is granted. | Sd/-JUDGE *pgn/-- Sd/- JUDGE |