By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate) Sri: Aditya V. Bhat, Advocate
High Court
18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate) Sri: Aditya V. Bhat, Advocate
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate) Sri: Aditya V. Bhat, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 |
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.414 OF 2018
BETWEEN‘
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.INTERNATIONAL TAXATION& FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION& FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..
2.|THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-T AXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION|CIRCLE-1(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION|CIRCLE-1(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR|SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
+AND"
M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITEDMARUTHI INFOTECH CENTRE|11/1, 11/2, KORAMANGALAAMAR JYOTI LAYOUTBENGALURU-560 O71.|
(BY MS. JOMOL JOY, ADVOCATE FORSRI: ADITYA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE) |SRI: ADITYA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE) |
RESPONDENT|
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF|ORDER DATED 05.02.2018 PASSED IN S.P.NO.18/BANG/2018|(IN IT(TP)A NO.1160/BANG/2015), FOR THE ASSESSMENT|YEAR2013-2014,VIDEANNEXURE-G,PRAYINGTHIS|HON'BLE|COURT|TOFORMULATETHESUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL|AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TA.XAPPELLATETRIBUNAL,BENGALURUINS.P.NO.18/BANG/2018 (IN IT(TP)A NO.1160/BANG/2015), DATED|05.02.7018FOR|ASSESSMENT|YEAR2013-2014,VIDE.ANNEXURE-G AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE.COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL|TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU.
OK OK
THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|COMING.ON.FOR|ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
A memo is filed by the appellants’ Counsel seekingto withdraw the appeal with a liberty to challenge theimpugned order by filing the writ petition.
In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed.as withdrawn. Tne liberty as sougnt for is granted.
In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
*pgn/-
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.