Case LawHigh Court › By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Adity...

By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate)Sri: Aditya V. Bhat, Advocate

High Court 18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate)Sri: Aditya V. Bhat, Advocate
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri: Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate)Sri: Aditya V. Bhat, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 | BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.41L5 OF 201 BETWEEN‘ 1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.INTERNATIONAL TAXATION' FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION' FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095.. 2.|THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-T AXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION|CIRCLE-1(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION|CIRCLE-1(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095.. .. APPELLANTS (BY SRI: JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR|SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITEDMARUTHI INFOTECH CENTRE|11/1, 11/2, KORAMANGALAAMAR JYOTI LAYOUTBENGALURU-560 O71. MARUTHI INFOTECH CENTRE|11/1, 11/2, KORAMANGALAAMAR JYOTI LAYOUTBENGALURU-560 O71. (BY MS. JOMOL JOY, ADVOCATE FORSRI: ADITYA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE)SRI: ADITYA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE) RESPONDENT| THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF|ORDER DATED 05.02.2018 PASSED IN S.P.NO.19/BANG/2018|(IN IT(TP)A NO.1161/BANG/2015), FOR THE ASSESSMENT|YEAR 2014-2015, PRAYING THIS HONBLE COURT TO}!FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED|ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS|PASSEDBY|THEINCOME-TA®XAPPELLATETRIBUNAL,BENGALURUINS.P.NO.19/BANG/2018 CINIT(TP)ANO.1161/BANG/2015), DATED 05.02.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT|YEAR 2014-2015, VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND CONFIRM THE)ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE.ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU. | OK AK THISINCOMETAXAPPEALCOMING ON|FOR|ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE)FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT A memo is filed by the appellants’ Counsel seekingto withdraw the appeal with a liberty to cnallenge theimpugned order by filing the writ petition. — In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed. as withdrawn. Tne liberty as sought for is granted. | Sd/-Sd/-JUDGEJUDGE |*pgn/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan