By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri:!Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate
High Court
18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri:!Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri:!Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 |
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.416 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.INTERNATIONAL TAXATION' FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION' FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..
2.|THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-T AXINTERNATIONAL TAXATIONCIRCLE-1(1), PRESENT ADDRESSINTERNATIONAL TAXATIONCIRCLE-1(1), PRESENT ADDRESS
JCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION
CIRCLE-2(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95..80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95..
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR|SRI:K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE).SRI:K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE).
AND
M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED (VMSL)
(FORMERLY M/S. VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED|AMALGAMATED WITH VMSL)_
MARUTHI INFOTECH CENTRE|
11/1, 12/1, KORAMANGALAAMAR JYOTI LAYOUTBENGALURU-560 0/71PAN: AABCB 584 ZL.
RESPONDENT|
(BY MS. JOMOL JOY, ADVOCATE FORSRI:!ADITYA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE) |
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER)DATED 02.01.2018 PASSED IN S.P.NO.295/BANG/2017 (IN|IT(TPJA NO.1160/BANG/2015), FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR)2013-2014, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO FORMULATE|THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE;|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY.THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU — INS.P.NO.295/BANG/2017 (IN IT(TP)A NO.1160/BANG/2015),|DATED 02.01.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014, AND|CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER.CONFIRMING|THE.ORDER|PASSEDBY|THE.JOINTCOMMISSIONEROF|INCOME.TAX,INTERNATIONAL|TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU.
OK AK
THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEALCOMING.ON.FOR —ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
A memo is filed Dy the appellants’ Counsel seeking
to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to challenge theimpugned order by filing the writ petition. —
In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed.as withdrawn. Tne liberty as sought for is granted. |
Sd/-
Sd/-.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*pgn/--
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.