Case LawHigh Court › By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri:!Adity...

By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri:!Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate

High Court 18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri:!Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Ms. Jomol Joy, Advocate Forsri:!Aditya v. Bhat, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 | BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.416 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.INTERNATIONAL TAXATION' FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095..INTERNATIONAL TAXATION' FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 095.. 2.|THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-T AXINTERNATIONAL TAXATIONCIRCLE-1(1), PRESENT ADDRESSINTERNATIONAL TAXATIONCIRCLE-1(1), PRESENT ADDRESS JCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95..80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 O95.. .. APPELLANTS (BY SRI: JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR|SRI:K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE).SRI:K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE). AND M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED (VMSL) (FORMERLY M/S. VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED|AMALGAMATED WITH VMSL)_ MARUTHI INFOTECH CENTRE| 11/1, 12/1, KORAMANGALAAMAR JYOTI LAYOUTBENGALURU-560 0/71PAN: AABCB 584 ZL. RESPONDENT| (BY MS. JOMOL JOY, ADVOCATE FORSRI:!ADITYA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE) | THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER)DATED 02.01.2018 PASSED IN S.P.NO.295/BANG/2017 (IN|IT(TPJA NO.1160/BANG/2015), FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR)2013-2014, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO FORMULATE|THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE;|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY.THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU — INS.P.NO.295/BANG/2017 (IN IT(TP)A NO.1160/BANG/2015),|DATED 02.01.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014, AND|CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER.CONFIRMING|THE.ORDER|PASSEDBY|THE.JOINTCOMMISSIONEROF|INCOME.TAX,INTERNATIONAL|TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU. OK AK THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEALCOMING.ON.FOR —ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT A memo is filed Dy the appellants’ Counsel seeking to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to challenge theimpugned order by filing the writ petition. — In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed.as withdrawn. Tne liberty as sought for is granted. | Sd/- Sd/-. JUDGE JUDGE *pgn/--
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan