By Sri. Annamalai S., Advocate For Sri v. Chandrashekar, Advocates

Digitallysigned byNARASIMHAMURTHYVANAMALALocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD -WRIT PETITION NO. 51811 OF 2019 (TIT) BETWEEN: M/S ROLLS ROYCE OPERATIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI RAVINDER SINGH BEDI, SON OF LATE SHRI SURJIT SINGH BEDI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, CAMPUS 2-A, UNIT 001, RMZ-NXT, GROUND FLOOR, WHITEFIELD ROAD, EPIP ZONE, MAHADEVAPURA, BENGALURU-560066. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANNAMALAI S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATES) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 5(1)(1), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K. V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER THE PROVISION OF SECTION 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A VIDE NO. ITBA/AST/S/148/2018-19/1015519479(1) DATED 29.3.2019 FOR THE A.Y.2012-13; QUASH THE ORDER OF DISPOSAL OF OBJECTION PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT AS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-B VIDE F .NO. ITBA/AST/F/17/2019-20/1019415619(1) DATED 24.10.2019 FOR THE A.Y, 2012-13. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN “B” GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Sri Annamalai S., the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri M. Dilip, the learned counsel for the respondent, are heard in the light of the memo for withdrawal which is taken on record. It is seen that the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition because the order for full and final settlement is issued in respect of the impugned demand under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 on 15.12.2021. Subject to just exceptions, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. SD/- JUDGE SA CT:sr