By Sri. Arvind v. Chavan, Advocate
High Court
26 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri. Arvind v. Chavan, Advocate
Date of order
26 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2021-2022
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri. Arvind v. Chavan, Advocate, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signed bySHAKAMBARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2025:KHC:12703-DB
ITA No. 238 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF MARCH, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS, 6 FLOOR UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE P. KALINGA RAO ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027 EXEMPTIONS, 6 FLOOR UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE P. KALINGA RAO ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION WARD-1, GROUND FLOOR ALBUQUERQUE HOUSE, OPP. FORUM FIZA MALL PANDESHWAR, MANGALORE 575001
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. ARVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI. MAHALINGESHWARA TEMPLE TEMPLE BUILDINGS, MAIN ROAD, PUTTUR-574 201 PAN: REPRESENTE BY ITS SECRETARY
…RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 22/03/2024 PASSED IN ITA NO.76/BANG/2024, ASSESSMENT YEAR 2021-2022 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE HON'BLE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO. 76/BANG/2024 DATED 22.03.2024 FOR 2021-2022 ANNEXURE-A CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE RECTIFICATION ORDER DATED 07.03.2023 AND ETC.
ASSESSMENT
- 2 -
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT)
This Appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limit described under Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No.9/2024 dated 15.03.2024. Hence, appeal is disposed off as not maintainable. Liberty is reserved to seek revival, if it is otherwise maintainable by way of exception in view of Circular No.5/2024.
Registry to send a copy of this order through speed post to the respondent-Assessee, immediately.
Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE
AM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.