By Sri Harisn v. S., Advocate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV %WRIT PETITION No. 4514/2017 (TIT) Between Mrs. S. K. ManorameaW/o. Mr. Kupendra SettyAged about 64 yearsResiding at No.55,Sri. Vijayesnwari Cotton Trading Co. —RMC Yard, Chitradurga 577 502. (By Sri Harisn V. S., Advocate) _ Petitioner. And Tne Income Tax Officer.Ward-1|Tamatakal Road, Medenalli,Chitradurga 5/77 502. (By Sri. K. V. Aravind, Adv.) .. Respondent| This Writ Petition ts filed under Articles 276 and 2727/7 of tConstitution of India praying to quash the impugned assessmentorder passed by the respondent under Section 143(3) of the.Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.12.2016 for the assessment year|2014-15 j.e., Annexure-C and the consequential notice ofdemand issued by the respondent dated 30.12.2016 for theassessment year 2014-15 I.e., Annexure C-1. Tnis Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing B-group this day, the Court, made tne following: ORDER Petitioner has filed a memo, which read as follows: “Tne counsel! for the petitioner numbly prays tnatthis Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit tne|petitioner to settle the dispute under the Vivaad|Se Visnhwas Scheme, 2020, by availing thebenefit of the Scheme and to restore the above|writ petition, if need arises at tne appropriate|stage, in the interest of equity and Justice.” In light of the said memo, petition is)aGismisse Liberty is reserved to initiate proceedings regarding the|Same cause of action, if settlement is not concluded in|accordance with law. | Sd/-. JUDGE