By Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, Advocate For Sri. K v. Aravind, Advocate
High Court
18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, Advocate For Sri. K v. Aravind, Advocate
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, Advocate For Sri. K v. Aravind, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.183 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
2. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD – 3(4), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K. V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND
SHRI T. SURESH GOWDA No.65, VANI VILAS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE - 560004
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN ITA No.305/BNG/2009 DATED 30.12.2009 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WARD-3(4), BANGALORE; AND ETC.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit
that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
2. In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE JUDGE
JUDGE
RD
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue