By Sri K v. Aravind, Adv
High Court
20 Jan 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri K v. Aravind, Adv
Date of order
20 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri K v. Aravind, Adv, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal is|dismissed as. withdrawn Sd/-.JUDGE| Sd/-.JUDGE| SPS
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20[th]DAY OF JANUARY 2ZO15
PRESENT
THER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMARAN 1
THER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VBEBRAPP
1.T.A. NO. 1°75 oft 20
BETWEEN:
M/s. Rambhai Patel & Sons,Rep. by Sri M.R. Patel,No.4, Loop Lane,Race Course Road,Bangalore — 560 009s_ APPHRLLANT|
(By Sri. A. Shankar & Sri M. Lava, Advs.) |
AND :.
Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax.Circle 3(1)BangaloreRBSPONDENT|
(By Sri K. V. Aravind, Adv.)
This I.T.A. is filed under Section QJ6AOA of thIncome Tax Act, 1961, arising out of order dated31.10.2008 passed in ITA No.2291/BNG/1990, for theAssessment year 1939-90 praying to:
-9O-.
7%:formulate the substantial questions of lawstated therein, ©stated therein, ©
7%%:Allow the appeal and set-aside the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,wBangalorein.1.T.A.No.2291/BNG/1990dated 31-10-2008, in the interest of justiceand equity.passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,wBangalorein.1.T.A.No.2291/BNG/1990dated 31-10-2008, in the interest of justiceand equity.
This I.T.A. coming on_ forhearing,this day,N.Kumar J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave
of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
2. Permission is granted. Appeal is|dismissed as.
withdrawn
Sd/-.JUDGE|
Sd/-.JUDGE|
SPS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.