By Sri K v. Aravind, Advocate
High Court
05 Jun 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri K v. Aravind, Advocate
Date of order
05 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri K v. Aravind, Advocate, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is, nereby, dismissed as withdrawn. | MD| Sd/-—JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF JUNE 2018
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN|
AND
THE HON'’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
I.T.A.No.394/201/
BETWEEN:
1.THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIT(A),5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,BENGALURU - 560 095.BENGALURU - 560 095.
2 |THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER,WARD-11(1), PRESENT ADDRESSWARD-2(1)(1),2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,BENGALURU - 560 O95.WARD-11(1), PRESENT ADDRESSWARD-2(1)(1),2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,BENGALURU - 560 O95.
. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K. V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:|
M/S. CDC SOFTWARE INDIA PVT. LTD.,
. AND / FLOOR, CANBERRA BLOCK,|UB CITY 24, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD,BENGALURU - 560 025. |.., RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI A. SHANKAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME|TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 14.10.2016 PASSED.IN C.O.NO.113/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006,PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET|
ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAIT, BENGALURU INC.O.NO.113/BANG/2015 DATED 14.10.2016 CONFIRMING THE ORDEROF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER|PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BENGALURU. III. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS|AS THIS HON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND|CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND|EQUITY.
THIS1.7 A.COMING|ON.FOR.ADMISSION.THISDAY,RAGHVENDRA S,. CHAUHAN , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo.for withdrawing the appeal. The memo shall be taken on record.
2. The appeal is, nereby, dismissed as withdrawn. |
MD|
Sd/-—JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.