Case LawHigh Court › By Sri. K v. Aravind, Advocate

By Sri. K v. Aravind, Advocate

High Court 07 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri. K v. Aravind, Advocate
Date of order
07 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Sri. K v. Aravind, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In view of the submission made, the appeals are dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 7 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.452 OF 2010 CONNECTED WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.451 OF 2010 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2(3) C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2(3) C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU ...COMMON APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K. V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND SRI. JAIKISHAN VIRWANI 101, EMBASSY CHAMBERS No.5, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD BENGALURU …RESPONDENT IN ITA No.452 of 2010 M/S. EMBASSY CLASSIC P. LTD. 101, EMBASSY CHAMBERS No.5, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD BENGALURU …RESPONDENT IN ITA No.451 of 2010 (BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) INCOME TAX APPEAL No.452 OF 2010 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN ITA No.976/BANG/2009 DATED 22.07.2010 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(3), BANGALORE; AND ETC. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.451 OF 2010 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN ITA No.811/BANG/2009 DATED 22.07.2010 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(3), BANGALORE; AND ETC. THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeals are not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by the Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. In view of the submission made, the appeals are dismissed as such. Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE JUDGE RD
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan