By Sri K v. Aravind, Advocate
High Court
11 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri K v. Aravind, Advocate
Date of order
11 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
1996-1997
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri K v. Aravind, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, the)appeal is dismissed as having abated.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE Ll DAY OF MARCH, 2019
BEFORE.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. G. PANDIT|INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.199 OF 2010
BEI|WEEN
SHRI ABDUL KAREEM LADSAB TELGICENTRAL JAIL, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA,BENGALURU-560 100.
~... APPELLAN
(BY SRI A. SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FORSRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
AND"
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF |INCOME - TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU-560 OO1.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K. V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDER.DATED29-O1-2Z010PASSEDIN|LTA]NO.1474/BANG/2008, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1996-1997,PRAYING TO|FORMULATETHE|SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE|APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE.INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU IN ITA.NO.1474/BANG/2008,DATED 29.01.2010. |
AK AK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERSTHIS|DAY,RAVI.MALIMATHJ,DELIVEREDTHE|FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Steps have not been taken in respect of deceased|appellant inspite of granting sufficient time. Hence, the)appeal is dismissed as having abated.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RskK/-
Sd/- |
JUDGE |
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue