Case LawHigh Court › By Sri v. Chandrasekhar, Advocate

By Sri v. Chandrasekhar, Advocate

High Court 08 Jul 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri v. Chandrasekhar, Advocate
Date of order
08 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Sri v. Chandrasekhar, Advocate, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: We do not find any error in the learned Single Judge's order, applying the ratio of the said decision to the subject petition and granting the relief to the Assessees. - 3 - In view of the above, the appeal being unworthy of merits, is liable to be and accordingly rejected, costs having been made ea...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby SHAKAMBARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA NC: 2024:KHC:25833-DB WA No. 320 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF JULY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR -WRIT APPEAL NO. 320 OF 2024 (TIT) BETWEEN: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 095 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. Y.V. RAVIRAJ, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL) AND: M/S. AD2PRO MEDIA SOLUTIONS INC., USA REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI. VENKATESAPERUAMAL GOPALAKISHNAN, SON OF LATE SRI. VENKATESAPERUMAL AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NO. 23371, MULHOLLAND DR. NO. 132, WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364 USA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V. CHANDRASEKHAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.4409/2021 DATED 13/04/2023. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, KRISHNA S DIXIT J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The challenge is to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 13.04.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.4233/2021(T-IT), whereby a batch of petitions having been favoured, the Assessees therein have been granted relief. 2. On perusal of the paper book, we notice that the learned Single Judge has followed the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in ITA No.232/2020 and connected matters. We do not find any error in the learned Single Judge's order, applying the ratio of the said decision to the subject petition and granting the relief to the Assessees. - 3 - In view of the above, the appeal being unworthy of merits, is liable to be and accordingly rejected, costs having been made easy. Sd/- JUDGE YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9 Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan