Case LawHigh Court › By Sri v. Chandrashekar, Adv., &Sri. M L...

By Sri v. Chandrashekar, Adv., &Sri. M Lava, Adv

High Court 17 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri v. Chandrashekar, Adv., &Sri. M Lava, Adv
Date of order
17 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Sri v. Chandrashekar, Adv., &Sri. M Lava, Adv, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1/[TH|]DAY OF DECEMBER 2020. PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD BETWEEN: 1T.A. NO.200 OF ZO18 M/S. CONTINENTAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION.LIMITEDREP. BY ITS SRI. D. MALLIKARJIUNA REDDY# 5995, 1ST FLOORDR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, PRAKASHNAGAR_BENGALURU-5600 21PAN: AAACC 8411 E.. (BY SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV., &|SRI. M LAVA, ADV.,). .... APPELLAN/ AND* THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-11(2), BMTC BUILDING|80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA6TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560095. (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) ~. RESPONDENT THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10.11.2017 PASSEDIN ITA NQO.736/BANG/2010 (APPELLANT APPEAL) AND ITANO. 768/BANG/2010(RESPONDENTAPPEAL)FOR|THE|ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A), PRAYING TO: | (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS.STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME FAVOUR OF THEAPPELLAN!. | (ii) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS.THEREIN TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN JHE.COMMON ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAXK APPELLATETRIBUNAL, C BENCH, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.736/BANG/2010(APPELLANT APPEAL) AND ITA NO.768/BANG/2010 (RESPONDENT|APPEAL) DATED 10.11.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07—(ANNEXURE-A). (il)PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON BLECOURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/-.JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan