By Sri v. Chandrashekar, Adv., &Sri. M Lava, Adv
High Court
17 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
By Sri v. Chandrashekar, Adv., &Sri. M Lava, Adv
Date of order
17 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri v. Chandrashekar, Adv., &Sri. M Lava, Adv, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1/[TH|]DAY OF DECEMBER 2020.
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
1T.A. NO.629 OF 2016BETWEEN:
M/S. POOJA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED.REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTORMRS. KAVITA S. MALANL# 212, RICHMOND TOWERS.29, RICHMOND ROADBENGALURU-560025.
(BY SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV., &|SRI. M LAVA, ADV.,).
— ADPELLANT
AND*
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER.WARD -12(1), BMTC BUILDING.SO FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA|6TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560095.
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI)
.., RESPONDENT
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 29.07.2016 PASSEDIN ITA NO.137/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10,PRAYING TQ: |
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS.STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME FAVOUR OF THEAPPELLAN!. |
(ii) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS.TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED|BY THE ITAT, C BENCH, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.137/BANG/2013_DATED 29-07-2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10(ANNEXURE-A).
(il)PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON BLECOURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS I1.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,ALOKARADAHE J.DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.V.ChandrashekKar, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr.Jeevan J.Neeralgi, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record.
2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.