By Sri v. Chandrashekhar, Adv., &Sri. M. Lava, Adv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1/ DAY OF DECEMBER 2070 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD BETWEEN: ILT.A. NO.287 OF 2014 M/S. RAVIPRAKASH REFINERIES PVT LTDREP. BY ITS DIRECTORMR. N.T. PRAKASHPOST BOX NO.18, A.G. ROADCHALLAKERE-5//5272. (BY SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADV., &SRI. M. LAVA, ADV.,) — APPELLANT. AND* DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2)C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROADBANGALORE-560001. (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) .., RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT,|1961L ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13.02.2014 PASSED IN ITANOS.1551 & 1552/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR2006-07 & 200/-08, PRAYING TO: (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS.STATED ABOVE AND ANSER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE.APPELLAN ][ (II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO)THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE COMMON ORDER.PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN ITA’NOS.1551 & 1552/BANG/2013 DATED 13.02.2014 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-07 AND 200/7-08 RESPECTIVELY. THIS|ITACOMING|ONFOR.HEARING,THISALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | DAY, | JUDGMENT Mr.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises. Sd/-JUDGE. RV Sd/-—JUDGE.