By Sri v. Chandrashekhar, Adv., &Sri. M. Lava, Adv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1/ DAY OF DECEMBER 2070 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD BETWEEN: ILT.A. NO.235 OF 2013 LATE SRI. SYED ASLAM HASHMLREP. BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVEMRS. YASMIN ASLAM HASHML.A-103, WELLINGTON PARK|WELLINGTON STREET.RICHMOND TOWN,BANGALORE-560025. (BY SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADV., &SRI. M. LAVA, ADV.,) ... APPELLAN| AND" THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER.INTERNATIONAL TAXATION.WARD 2(1), 6TH FLOOR|# 14/3, R.P. BHAVAN.NRUPATHUNGA ROADOPP. RBI, BANGALORE-560001. (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) ~. RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT,|1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.09.2012 PASSED IN ITA.NO.1313/BANG/2010AND|1076/BANG/2012,FORTHEASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-038, PRAYING TQ: (I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW.STATED THEREIN.» (II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER.PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1313/BANG/2010°AND 1076/BANG/2012, DATED 28-09-2012. THIS|LIACOMING|ONFOR.HEARING,THISDAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is_dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-.JUDGE RV