By Sri v. Chandrashekhar, Adv., &Sri. M. Lava, Adv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1/ DAY OF DECEMBER 2070 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASADILT.A. NO.401 OF Z2O1 BETWEEN: M/S. KALKI COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,REP. BY ITS DIRECTORSRI. SUNIL VARGIS MATHEWNO.147, 2ND FLOOR, 5TH MAIN ROAD|HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-/7BANGALORE-560102. ... APPELLAN| (BY SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADV., &SRI. M. LAVA, ADV.,) AND* THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER.INTERNATIONAL TAXATION.WARD-1(2), 6TH FLOOR|#14/3, R.P. BHAVAN|NRUPATHUNGA ROADOPP, RBI BANKBANGALORE-560001. (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) ~. RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT,|1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 15.04.2015 PASSED IN ITA.NOS.1401 & 1403/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS)2009-10 & 2010-11 & 2011-12, PRAYING [O: (I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS.STATED ABOVE AND ANSER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE.APPELLAN ][ (II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO)THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE COMMON ORDER.PASSED BY THE ITAT IN ITA NOS.1401-1403/BANG/2013 DATED.15-04-2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2009-10, 2010-11 &2OL1-12— THIS|LIACOMING|ONFOR.HEARING,THISALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | DAY, | JUDGMENT Mr.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE. RV Sd/-—JUDGE.