By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Adv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH ON THE 26[th]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 BEEBEO THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR REVIEW PETITION No.100186 OF 2014 INITA No.100084 OF 2014 BETWEEN: 1.INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-I (2), F.K-COMPLEXB.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. 2.THR COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, DIST: BELAGAVI. — PRTTTIONERS (BY SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.) ANI THERE MARKANDEYA MAHILA MULTI PURPOCO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,NO.12, AT POST KANGRALI-KHURD,TQ: BELGAUM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,PRAMOD APPAJI KADAM , AGE: 40 YEARSS/O APPAJI KADAM .. RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PEHTITION FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE R/W. SEC.114 OF CPC., PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDERDATED 25.09.2014 PASSED IN THE ITA. NO. 100084/2014 (T-IT) ONTHE FILE OF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWADBENCH. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HRARING ON [A THISDAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING; ORDER It is submitted that the judgment under review herein waspassed following the earlier judgment of this Court in ITANo.100042 of 2014 disposed off on 17[th]September 2014.A number of matters were also disposed off. Some of thosematters have been challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.Therefore, the only plea of the petitioners 1s that in case thepetitioners succeed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, they maybe granted liberty to revive this petition, ? In view of the submissions made, there is noimpediment to grant liberty to the petitioners to revive thispetition in case, they receive appropriate orders from the Hon’bleSupreme Coutt. The petition is disposed off accordingly. 5+'JUDGE RK/- 5+'JUDGE