By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Adv
High Court
17 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Adv
Date of order
17 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Adv, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL
I.T.A. NO. 100129/2015 C/W I.T.A.NO.100128/2015, I.T.A.NO.100102/2015, I.T.A.NO.100104/2015,
I.T.A.NO.100127/2015 & I.T.A.NO.100130/2015
IN I.T.A. NO. 100129/2015:
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI. WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
... APPELLANTS
AND
M/S. PANCHAMUKHI BUILDERS
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVI. PAN: .
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.268/PNJ/2014, DATED 12.03.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.
IN I.T.A.NO.100128/2015:
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
M/S. JAI GANESH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, 299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVI. PAN: .
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH PANAJI, IN ITA NO.275/PNJ/2014 DATED 12.03.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.
IN I.T.A.NO.100102/2015:
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1(1),BELAGAVI DIST: BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
SHRI KIRAN M JADHAV, PROP: VIMAL BUILDERS, 299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVI. PAN: .
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO (a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET - ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH PANAJI, IN ITA NO.270/PNJ/2014, DTD:12.03.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.
IN I.T.A.NO.100104/2015:
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1(1), BELAGAVI DIST: BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
SHRI KIRAN M JADHAV, PROP: VIMAL BUILDERS, 299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVI. PAN: .
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN ITA NO.272/PNJ/2014 DATED 12.03.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.
IN I.T.A.NO.100127/2015:
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
M/S. JAI GANESH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, 299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVI. PAN: .
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO (a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE
IN I.T.A.NO.100127/2015:
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
M/S. JAI GANESH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, 299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVI. PAN: .
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO (a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE
INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH PANAJI, IN ITA NO.274/PNJ/2014, DTD:12.03.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.
IN I.T.A.NO.100130/2015:
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
M/S. PANCHAMUKDHI BUILDERS, 299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVI. PAN: .
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO a) FORMULATE THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN ITA NO.269/PNJ/2014 DATED 12.03.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, S.N.SATYANARAYANA,J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
These appeals are in challenge to the revenue order granted in favour of the assessee.
The learned counsel for the appellants would bring to the notice of this Court that in the light of recent circular bearing No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, the present appeals do not survive, in view of the pecuniary limitation prescribed under the aforesaid circular, is in excess of challenge to the order impugned. Hence, he seek permission to withdraw the appeals filed by the revenue. Memo is accepted. Appellants are permitted to withdraw the appeals.
Accordingly, withdrawn.
KGK
appeals are dismissed
SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE
as
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.