By Sri Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
High Court
16 Dec 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
By Sri Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
Date of order
16 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri Y v. Raviraj, Advocate, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The said submission is taken on record.This appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
Dated this the 16[th] day of December 2016
Present
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
And
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
Income Tax Appeal No.100196/2015
Between
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Veedhi,
Belagavi.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax,
Circle-1, Belagavi.
…Appellants
(By Sri Y. V. Raviraj, Advocate)
And:
Shree Basaveshwar Co-op. Bank Ltd.,
CTS No.704 & 705, 1[st] Floor,
Ravivar Peth, Belagavi.
PAN .
…Respondent
(By Sri H.R.Kambiyavar, Advocate)
This appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, praying to formulate the substantial questionof law stated above; and allow the appeal and set aside theorders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PanajiBench, Panaji, in ITA No.406/PNJ/2014 dated 13.07.2015and confirm the order passed by the Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax, Belagavi, in the interest of justice and equity.
This appeal coming on for Admission this day,RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN, J, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Mr. H. R. Kambiyavar, the learned counsel,undertakes to appear for the respondent.
Mr. Y. V. Raviraj, the learned counsel for theappellants fairly submits that the question raised in thisappeal is answered against the appellants in ITANo.100047/2015 and ITA Nos.100048-49/2015 (disposed ofon 16.12.2015). The said submission is taken on record.This appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
Kms
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.