By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
High Court
24 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
Date of order
24 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The review petition is dismissed as it does not survive for consideration.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL
R.P. No.100041 of 2019
(IN ITA No.289 of 2014)
BETWEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDs, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, TDs, AAYAKAR BHAVAN,
SEDAM ROAD, GULBARGA.
2.THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDs CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BAHVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY-583102. INCOME TAX, TDs CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BAHVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY-583102.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S KALYANI STEELS LTD., HOSPET ROAD, GINIGRA, KOPPAL DIST.
...RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.289/2014 DATED 12.02.2018 AND RESTORE THE SAME TO BE HEARD AND DISPOSED ON MERITS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, S.N. SATYANARAYANA, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners would bring to the notice of this Court that, the order under review is covered by the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Therefore, this review petition does not survive for consideration. His submission is placed on record.
A memo is also filed by the petitioners for withdrawal. Same is taken on record. The review petition is dismissed as it does not survive for consideration.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue