By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
High Court
03 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
Date of order
03 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03 DAY OF JANUARY, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR
-WRIT PETITION NO.111961 OF 2014 (TIT)
BETWEEN
THE TOTGARS CO-OPERATIVE SALE SOCIETY, SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, RAVISH ACHYUT HEGDE, A/A: 47 YEARS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE TOTGARS CO-OPERATIVE SALE SOCIETY, SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIJAY M MALALI, ADVOCATE)
AND
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS),
NAVNAGAR, HUBLI, DIST-DHARWAD
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BY WAY OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO TAKE UP THE HEARING OF APPEALS BEARING NO.161/HBL/2012-13, 162/HBL/2012-13, 163/HBL/2012-13 AND 164/HB/2012-13 AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE AND DISPOSE THE SAME AT THE EARLIEST.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A memo has been preferred by the learned counsel
for the petitioner praying leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sd/-) JUDGE
yan
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue