By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
High Court
24 Nov 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate
Date of order
24 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Sri. Y v. Raviraj, Advocate, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, the following: ORDER i)The writ petition is allowed. ii)The respondents are directed to open the portal to enable the petitioner to submit his return of income making a claim for deduction under Section 80P of the Act, and if for any reason the portal cannot be opened, the petitioner is permi...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
MOHANKUMARB SHELARDigitally signed byMOHANKUMAR BSHELARDate: 2023.11.2811:23:43 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE -WRIT PETITION NO. 105700 OF 2023 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. SHREE VISHALA MAHILA SAHAKAR SANGH NIYAMIT, (A CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ESTABLISHED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETEIS ACT, 1959), NEAR BUS STAND, KULAGOD VILLAGE, GOKAK TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-591310, KARANTAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SMT. SAROJA KOULAPUR.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, GOKAK, DR. GHOGERI BUILDING, BELGAUM ROAD, GOKAK, KARNATAKA-591307. DR. GHOGERI BUILDING, BELGAUM ROAD, GOKAK, KARNATAKA-591307.
2. THE SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001, REPRESENTED BY THE ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING ISSUE A DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND 2ND RESPONDENT, PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO FILE, EITHER ELECTRONICALLY OR IN PRINTED PAPER FORM OR ANY OTHER MODE AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY THINK FIT, THE RETURN OF INCOME IN RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE ISSUED U/S 148 OF THE ACT BEARING DIN AND NOTICE NUMBER ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022-
23/1042567311(1) DATED 06.04.2022 IN ANNEXURE-B ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT, WITHIN SUCH TIME AS THIS HON BLE COURT MAY THINK FIT AND ISSUE A DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND 2ND RESPONDENT, PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO MADE A CLAIM FOR DEDUCATION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE ACT IN THE RETURN OF INCOME TO BE FILED IN RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE ISSUED U/S 148 OF THE ACT BEARING DIN AND NOTICE NUMBER ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022-23/1042567311(1) DATED 06.04.2022 IN ANNEXURE-B ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
for the assessment year 2018-19, the petitioner was unable to upload the returns on account of technical problem and the present writ petition is filed with a prayer to permit the petitioner to upload the returns electronically or on printed paper or to direct the respondents to open the portals.
3.Learned counsel for the respondents on
instructions submits that the issue involved in this case is covered in terms of order passed by Coordinate Bench of
this court in W.P.No.201282/2022. This court in paragraph 8, held as under:
“The respondents are directed to open the portal to enable the petitioner to submit his return of income making a claim for deduction under Section 80P of the Act, and if for any reason the portal cannot be opened, the petitioner is permitted to file his return of income in response to the notice under Section 148 of the Act, physically, and the respondents are directed to receive the same and thereafter proceed further in accordance with law. It is needless to state that the authorities have the power to verify the details uploaded.”
4.Under these circumstances, this petition is disposed of in terms of the said order. Hence, the following:
ORDER
i)The writ petition is allowed.
ii)The respondents are directed to open the portal
to enable the petitioner to submit his return of income making a claim for deduction under
Section 80P of the Act, and if for any reason the portal cannot be opened, the petitioner is permitted to file his return of income in response to the notice under Section 148 of the
4.Under these circumstances, this petition is disposed of in terms of the said order. Hence, the following:
ORDER
i)The writ petition is allowed.
ii)The respondents are directed to open the portal
to enable the petitioner to submit his return of income making a claim for deduction under
Section 80P of the Act, and if for any reason the portal cannot be opened, the petitioner is permitted to file his return of income in response to the notice under Section 148 of the
Act, physically, and the respondents are directed to receive the same and thereafter proceed further in accordance with law. It is needless to state that the authorities have the power to verify the details uploaded.
Sd/- JUDGE
MBS/ct-an List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.