Case LawHigh Court › C. Rev./387/2011 Of M/S Princeton Niketa...

C. Rev./387/2011 Of M/S Princeton Niketan Pvt. Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner, Income Tax - Ii, Central Revenue Building

High Court 17 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
C. Rev./387/2011 Of M/S Princeton Niketan Pvt. Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner, Income Tax - Ii, Central Revenue Building
Date of order
17 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In C. Rev./387/2011 Of M/S Princeton Niketan Pvt. Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner, Income Tax - Ii, Central Revenue Building, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: Review petition is summarily rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Review No.387 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11788 of 2011 ====================================================== M/s Princeton Niketan Pvt. Ltd., 004, Mirambika Apartment, Boring Road, Patna, through its Managing Director Mr. Jitendra Singh S/O Sri C. Singh Rersident of Flat No. 006, Rameshwaram Apartment, Mitra Mandal Compound, Boring Road, Patna - 800 001 at present resident of Flat No. 703, Block - C, Kaushalya Estate, Bandar Bagicha, Patna - 800 001 .... .... Petitioner-Petitioner Versus 1.The Chief Commissioner, Income Tax - II, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path, Patna 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path, Patna Path, Patna 3.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Near Dakbanglow, Frazer Road, Patna Dakbanglow, Frazer Road, Patna 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 2, Patna .... .... Respondents- Respondents. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ansul, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) This review petition has been filed by the writ petitioner in CWJC No. 11788 of 2011 for review of our order dated 5[th] September 2011 made on CWJC No. 11788 of 2011. 4 17-10-2012 The matter at issue is the recovery of the outstanding income tax dues pending the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). It is apparent that under the guise of review petition, 2 / 2 the petitioner seeks rehearing of the writ petition. Review petition is summarily rejected. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) Sujit/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan