Case LawHigh Court › Ca/193/2011 Of Mrs. Sheena Proenca v. Co...

Ca/193/2011 Of Mrs. Sheena Proenca v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr

High Court 15 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Ca/193/2011 Of Mrs. Sheena Proenca v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
15 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ca/193/2011 Of Mrs. Sheena Proenca v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn and consequently, Civil Application No.193/2011 and Misc.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO.17 OF 2011, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 193/2011AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 871/2011 MRS. SHEENA PROENCA. ...….. APPELLANT/ APPLICANT V/S. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANOTHER. ...….. RESPONDENTS. Mr. P. Rao, Advocate for the appellant/applicant. Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM :- A.P. LAVANDE & U.V. BAKRE, JJ. DATE : - 15/10/2012 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Rao for the appellant/applicant and Ms. Dessai for the respondents. Misc. Civil Application No. 871/2011 has been filed for withdrawal of Tax Appeal No.17/2011. Ms. Dessai appearing for the respondent has no objection. 3.Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn and consequently, Civil Application No.193/2011 and Misc. Civil Application No.871/2011 stand disposed of. A.P. LAVANDE, J. U.V. BAKRE, J. ssm.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan