Ca/64/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai v. Star India Pvt. Ltd.------Transferee
High Court
29 Jan 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ca/64/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai v. Star India Pvt. Ltd.------Transferee
Date of order
29 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ca/64/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai v. Star India Pvt. Ltd.------Transferee, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
rpa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION (L.) NO. 6 OF 2010
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 892 OF 2009CONNECTED WITHCOMPANY APPLICATION NO. 875 OF 2009.
In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956;
STAR India Pvt. Ltd... TransfereeAndDirector of Income Tax(International Taxation)Mumbai.. Applicant
....
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Applicant.Mr. Iqbal Chogla, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Sanjay Jain i/b. AZB and Partner for the Petition in Company Petition No. 892 of 2009.Mr. C.J. Joy – Regional Director.
....
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE : 29TH JANUARY 2010.
P.C.
2.By this Company Application, the Applicant-Director of Income Tax (International Taxation), seeks permission of this
Court to intervene in the above Company Petition and Company Application No. 875 of 2009.
3.The Company Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4.The learned Advocate for the Applicant shall get the Company Application numbered on or before 1[st] February, 2010.
5.Company Petition to be listed on 18[th] February, 2010.
6.The request of learned Advocate for the Applicant to treat the affidavit filed alongwith Company the Application (L.) No. 6 of 2010, as affidavit in reply to Company Petition No. 892 of 2009, is allowed.
7.The Company Application (L.) No. 6 of 2010 is, accordingly, disposed of.
[ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.