Case Law › High Court › Ca/8685/2011 Of M/S Purna Sahakari Sakha...

Ca/8685/2011 Of M/S Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Per Court

High Court 08 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

08 Feb 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ca/8685/2011 Of M/S Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Per Court, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET 56 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8685 OF 2011,In RC/1104/2011 M/S PURNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.VERSUSASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX...Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R. M. SharmaAdvocate for Respondent : Mr. Alok Sharma ... CORAM : R.M. BORDE & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.Dated: February 08, 2013... PER COURT : 1.This is an application for condonation of delay of 103 days occurred in presenting appeal. Considering the contentions raised in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. Delay occurred in presenting appeal stands condoned. Civil application stands disposed of. ( T.V. NALAWADE, J. ) ( R.M. BORDE, J. ) ... dyb

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.