Ca/897/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Central ) Nagpur v. Omprakash R S Bharukha
High Court
29 Sep 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Ca/897/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Central ) Nagpur v. Omprakash R S Bharukha
Date of order
29 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ca/897/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Central ) Nagpur v. Omprakash R S Bharukha, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: However, taking into consideration the fact that the appeals were erroneously filed at Nagpur Bench of this Court, which were subsequently withdrawn which has resulted in delay in filing the present appeals, we are inclined to allow the applications.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 897 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO.1228 OF 2008WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 898 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1236 OF 2008
WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 899 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1233 OF 2008
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 900 OF 2008
ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1238 OF 2008WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 901 OF 2008
ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1224 OF 2008
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 902 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1226 OF 2008
WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 903 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1165 OF 2008
WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 904 OF 2008
IN INCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1230 OF 2008
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
2
Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for ApplicantShri R. R. Chandak, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM :B. R. GAVAI &
N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 29th September 2009.
PER COURT:
1.These applications are for condonation of delay.Applications are vehemently opposed by Shri Chandak, learned Counsel for respondents. However,
taking into consideration the fact that the appeals were erroneously filed at Nagpur Bench of this Court, which were subsequently withdrawn which has resulted in delay in filing the present appeals, we are inclined to allow the applications. Applications are allowed. Delay is condoned.
[ N. D. DESHPANDE, J. ] [ B. R. GAVAI, J. ]
pnk/ca89708
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue