Case Law › High Court › Ca/9801/2014 Of Uttam Bhagwanrao Jadhav...

Ca/9801/2014 Of Uttam Bhagwanrao Jadhav v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A Bench Pune And Anr

High Court 13 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

13 Oct 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ca/9801/2014 Of Uttam Bhagwanrao Jadhav v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A Bench Pune And Anr, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1/1 ca 9800.14 in income tax appeal no.68.13.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Civil Application No.9800 Of 2014.In Income Tax Appeal No.68 Of 2013. Alongwith Civil Application No.9801 Of 2014. Uttam Bhagwantrao Jadhav::Applicant.V e r s u sThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors. :: Respondents. Appearance => Mr. P.K. Lakhotia, Advocate alongwith Mr. Raviraj Chandak, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for the Applicant. Per Court :- CORAM :A.V. Nirgude & A.I.S. Cheema, JJ.DATE:13[th] October, 2014. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause [B], which reads thus :- "The order dated 23.09.2014 in the present Income Tax Appeal No.68/13 passed by this Hon'ble Court, may kindly be recalled and the caption appeal may kindly be restored at its original stage in the interest of justice" (A.I.S. Cheema, J.) (A.V. Nirgude, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.