Cals Refineries Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5(2
High Court
29 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Cals Refineries Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5(2
Date of order
29 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cals Refineries Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5(2, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
33
+ W.P.(C) 1698/2016
CALS REFINERIES LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Srivastava with Mr. Jatinder Pax Singh and Mr. Tanmay Sadh, Advocates.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(2)
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Jr. Standing counsel with Mr. P. Roy, Chaudhuri, Advocate.
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R% 29.02.2016
CM APPL 7259/2016 (for exemption)
1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
WP (C) 1698/2016 & CM APPL 7258/2016 (for stay)
3. After arguing for some time Mr. Vikas Srivastava, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks, on instructions, permission to withdraw this petition with
liberty to urge all points in this petition before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed
for. The pending application also stands dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
FEBRUARY 29, 2016 Rk
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
WP (C) 1698/2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue