Case Law › High Court › Cao583.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Inc...

Cao583.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 13 Oct 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

13 Oct 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cao583.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1 CAO583.17.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (O) No.583 of 2017Ballabhdas Mohta Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.S. Bhattad, Counsel for applicant. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ DATED:October 13, 2017 Heard. 2.Prayer is to condone delay of 56 days in filing application for review Stamp No. 1992/2016. 3.Reason for delay is when made before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by consulting Advocates there. 4.Respondents have not filed any reply to the prayer for condonation of delay. 5.As we do not see any malafides, we condone the same. 6.Registry to register MCA. 7.List MCA for further consideration on 10[th] November, 2017. 10[th] November, 2017. JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.