Caribjet Inc v. The Dy.cit Circle 2(1), Mumbai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.101 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.101 OF 2006 Caribjet Inc. .. Appellant Vs. The Dy.CIT Circle 2(1), Mumbai .. Respondent Mr.Atul Jasani for the Appellant. Mr.Parag Vyas for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.Vyas, the learned Advocate for the Respondent undertakes to file his vakalatnama within a period of two weeks from today. Undertaking is accepted. 2. Perused the affidavit of the learned Advocate for the Appellant dated 15.11.2008 where-from it is apparent that the learned Advocate for the Appellant is unable to get any instructions from the Appellant, and that the Appellant has been informed that the Advocate will be taking discharge from the matter. Under these circumstances, the learned Advocate for the Appellant stands discharged. Xerox copy of the aforesaid affidavit dated 15.11.2008 is taken on record. 3. None appears for the Appellant. Appeal stands dismissed in default. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)