Case LawHigh Court › Case Of Chem Amit v. Asst. Commissioner...

Case Of Chem Amit v. Asst. Commissioner Of

High Court 06 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Case Of Chem Amit v. Asst. Commissioner Of
Date of order
06 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Case Of Chem Amit v. Asst. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAXAPPEAL NO. 1104 OF 2008 INCOME TAX The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Shree Laxmi Enterprises. ... Respondent. D.K.Kamwat for the appellant. S.S.Shetty for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 6th October 2008. DATED : 6th October 2008. DATED : 6th October 2008. P.C. : P.C. :---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal arising out of miscellaneous application. 3. In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Chem Amit v. Asst. Commissioner of Chem Amit v. Asst. Commissioner ofIncome-tax, (2005) 272 ITR 397 (Bom.), appeal does not Income-tax lie against the order passed in miscellaneous application. The present appeal is, therefore, not maintainable at all. Hence appeal is dismissed.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan