Case LawHigh Court › Case Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. In...

Case Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Indo

High Court 01 Aug 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Case Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Indo
Date of order
01 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Case Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Indo, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question of law which is sought to be raised in this Application is whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of MODVAT credit of excise duty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Application No.33 of 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Applicant v/s. M/s.Foods Inns. Ltd. ..Respondents Mrs.A.S.Rao for applicant. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED : 1st August 2006 P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Rao in support of this Application. 2. The question of law which is sought to be raised in this Application is whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of MODVAT credit of excise duty. This question has been covered in favour of the assessee in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Indo Commissioner of Income Tax vs. IndoNippon Chemicals Co.Ltd. reported in ITR 261 page275. This being the position, no need to Nippon Chemicals Co.Ltd. reported in ITR 261 page 275 entertain the Application and the same is dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.) (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan