Case LawHigh Court › Case Ofc.i.t v. Pithwa Engg.works, (2005...

Case Ofc.i.t v. Pithwa Engg.works, (2005) 276

High Court 17 Jul 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Case Ofc.i.t v. Pithwa Engg.works, (2005) 276
Date of order
17 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Case Ofc.i.t v. Pithwa Engg.works, (2005) 276, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 647 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-tax-I,Nashik-2. V/s. M/s.H.V.Builders, Nashik. ... Respondent. ... Appellant. Shiv Motariya for the appellant. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19th August, 2005. P.C. :---- ITR 519. (2002) 254 ITR 565, we do not think it necessary to entertain this appeal for negligible tax effect. 3. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan