Cat/131/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Late Smt. Rukhminidevi Rathi Thr Lrs Shri Nk Rathi
High Court
07 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Cat/131/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Late Smt. Rukhminidevi Rathi Thr Lrs Shri Nk Rathi
Date of order
07 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cat/131/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Late Smt. Rukhminidevi Rathi Thr Lrs Shri Nk Rathi, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 130 OF 2010 AND 131 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2010(Commissioner of Income Tax-III .v. Late Smt. Rukhminidevi Rathi through L/R Naval Kishore Rathi, Amravati)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coramappearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Ordersand Registrar's orders.
Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the applicant.Shri L.S. Dewani, Advocate for the respondent/LR.
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.
07TH JULY, 2011.
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Though the learned Counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer made in the civil applications, for the reasons stated in the Civil Application No. 130 of 2010, the delay in filing the application for bringing the legal heirs is condoned and the abatement, if any, is set aside.
Both the civil applications are allowed and disposed of.
Necessary amendment should be carried out within a
period of one week.
Shri L.S. Dewani, the learned Counsel waives notice of hearing on behalf of the legal heirs.
*rrg.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue