Case LawHigh Court › Cat16.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Inco...

Cat16.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur

High Court 14 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Cat16.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur
Date of order
14 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Cat16.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application (CAT) No.16/2017 IN Income Tax Appeal No.(Stamp)No. 10711/2017.(Shri Vilas Mahadeorao Harde Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur) ______________________________________________________________________________ OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directionsand Registrar's orders DATE : 14.7.2017. This application seeks condonation of delay of 105 days infiling accompanying appeal from the order of the Tribunal dated 30[th]June, 2015 relating to Assessment Year 2006-2007. 2.We have perused the application. We are satisfied with thereasons stated therein explaining the reasons for the delay in filingappeal. Accordingly, the delay 105 days is condoned. 3.The application for condonation of delay is allowed. Gohane (MANISH PITALE, J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan