Case Law › High Court › Cat/16/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Cat/16/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(Vidarbha) Nagpur v. M/S Khare And Tarkundenagpur

High Court 03 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

03 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cat/16/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(Vidarbha) Nagpur v. M/S Khare And Tarkundenagpur, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAT No.16/2009 in Income Tax Reference No.16/2008 [The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur .vrs. M/s. Khare and Tarkunde,Nagpur] ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ...................................................................................................................................................................Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the applicant. .......... Coram : A.P. Lavande & P.D. Kode, JJ.Dated : 3rd April, 2009. Time to file affidavit of service is extended by threeweeks by way of last opportunity. The application is disposed of. Gulande JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.