Cat17.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur
High Court
14 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Cat17.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur
Date of order
14 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cat17.17.Odt v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Civil Application (CAT) No.17/2017 IN Income Tax Appeal No.(Stamp)No. 10710/2017.(Shri Vilas Mahadeorao Harde Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur)
With
Civil Application (CAT) No.18/2017 IN Income Tax Appeal No.(Stamp)No. 10715/2017.(Shri Vilas Mahadeorao Harde Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur)
______________________________________________________________________________
OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directionsand Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Shri K.P. Dewani, Advocate for appellant.Shri A. Parchure, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA &
MANISH PITALE, JJ.DATE : 14.7.2017.
These two applications are for condonation of delay of 105days in filing the accompanying appeals arising from a common orderdated 10[th] July, 2015 relating to Assessment Year 2007-2008. Theimpugned order of tribunal had disposed of two appeals one filed byRevenue and the other of the applicant – Assessee. Thus, twoapplications for condonation in two appeals filed by the Assessee.
2.We have perused the application and are satisfied with thereason stated therein for delay in filing accompanying appeals fromcomman order of the Tribunal dated 10[th] July, 2015.
3.Accordingly, these appeals for condonation delay areallowed.
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.