Cat/7/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha,Nagpur v. M/S. Nagpur Alloy Casting Ltd.nagpur
High Court
23 Feb 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Cat/7/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha,Nagpur v. M/S. Nagpur Alloy Casting Ltd.nagpur
Date of order
23 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Cat/7/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha,Nagpur v. M/S. Nagpur Alloy Casting Ltd.nagpur, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
C.A.T.NO.7/2012 IN I.T.R.NO.21/1995.The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Nagpur.-VERSUS-M/s. Nagpur Alloys Castings Ltd., Nagpur.
_______________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
______________________________________________________________________________
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI& A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 23, 2012.
Heard Shri A. Parchure, learned Counsel for applicant/appellant and Shri Dewani, learned counsel for respondent.
Shri Parchure, learned counsel states that department is examining the alleged cascading effect or recurrence of the issue.
Hence, with liberty to applicant to approach again, if after examining the matter, they are satisfied that the issue or effect falls for consideration, we dispose of the present application.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.