Caw/1386/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr
High Court
12 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Caw/1386/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr
Date of order
12 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Caw/1386/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
* 1/3 * CAW-1382-2018 (SR.2) GROUPThursday, 12.7.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1382 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5997 OF 2017
ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1384 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5752 OF 2017
ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1386 OF 2018
INWRIT PETITION NO. 3351 OF 2017
ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1387 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2321 OF 2017
ALONGWITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1392 OF 2018
INWRIT PETITION NO. 3509 OF 2017
ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1397 OF 2018
INWRIT PETITION NO. 1788 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax
(Central), Pune
Rane
* 2/3 * CAW-1382-2018 (SR.2) GROUP
Thursday, 12.7.2018
V/s.
Income-Tax Settlement CommissionAdditional Bench-I, MumbaiThrough Secretary
...Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Jehangir D. Mistri, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
DATE :-
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.12TH JULY, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.These applications seek recall of the common
order dated 14th June, 2018 passed by this Courtdismissing these petitions on account of non-prosecution.
2.We are satisfied with the reasons indicated inthe applications for absence when these petitions werecalled out for hearing.
3.Mr. Mistri, Learned Senior Counsel appearingfor respondent no.2 does not object to allowing of the Civil
Rane
* 3/3 * CAW-1382-2018 (SR.2) GROUPThursday, 12.7.2018
Applications.
4.The Civil Applications are accordingly allowed
in terms of prayer clause (a).
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.