Case LawHigh Court › Caw/1386/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Caw/1386/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr

High Court 12 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Caw/1386/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr
Date of order
12 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Caw/1386/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane * 1/3 * CAW-1382-2018 (SR.2) GROUPThursday, 12.7.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1382 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5997 OF 2017 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1384 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5752 OF 2017 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1386 OF 2018 INWRIT PETITION NO. 3351 OF 2017 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1387 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2321 OF 2017 ALONGWITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1392 OF 2018 INWRIT PETITION NO. 3509 OF 2017 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1397 OF 2018 INWRIT PETITION NO. 1788 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central), Pune Rane * 2/3 * CAW-1382-2018 (SR.2) GROUP Thursday, 12.7.2018 V/s. Income-Tax Settlement CommissionAdditional Bench-I, MumbaiThrough Secretary ...Respondent * * * * * Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Jehangir D. Mistri, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & DATE :- SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.12TH JULY, 2018. P.C. :- 1.These applications seek recall of the common order dated 14th June, 2018 passed by this Courtdismissing these petitions on account of non-prosecution. 2.We are satisfied with the reasons indicated inthe applications for absence when these petitions werecalled out for hearing. 3.Mr. Mistri, Learned Senior Counsel appearingfor respondent no.2 does not object to allowing of the Civil Rane * 3/3 * CAW-1382-2018 (SR.2) GROUPThursday, 12.7.2018 Applications. 4.The Civil Applications are accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan